Market Filter #001
DOGE just scored 10/10 on liquidity and 2/10 on revenue.
That eight-point gap is basically the whole argument for why I started this.
Every week from now until November 2026, I'm scoring the same projects on five fixed factors liquidity, user growth, developer activity, revenue, and relative strength with zero changes to the method in between.
Not because the method is perfect, but because a framework that quietly adjusts itself to match whatever performed well isn't really a framework.
Week 1: ETH tops the list at 49/50, near-perfect across every category. SOL follows at 47, edging ETH out on relative strength alone. SUI rounds out the top three at 43.
DOGE's split massive liquidity, almost nothing underneath it, is the exact kind of gap this exercise is built to surface. A high score here doesn't mean "buy this." It means the project currently has more real activity behind its price than the narrative suggests. Low score, inverse.
In November, I'll pull up every weekly card and check it against what actually happened in the market. If fundamentals didn't beat narrative, I'll say so.
Tell me where you'd push back, I'd rather find the holes in this now than in November.
DOGE just scored 10/10 on liquidity and 2/10 on revenue.
That eight-point gap is basically the whole argument for why I started this.
Every week from now until November 2026, I'm scoring the same projects on five fixed factors liquidity, user growth, developer activity, revenue, and relative strength with zero changes to the method in between.
Not because the method is perfect, but because a framework that quietly adjusts itself to match whatever performed well isn't really a framework.
Week 1: ETH tops the list at 49/50, near-perfect across every category. SOL follows at 47, edging ETH out on relative strength alone. SUI rounds out the top three at 43.
DOGE's split massive liquidity, almost nothing underneath it, is the exact kind of gap this exercise is built to surface. A high score here doesn't mean "buy this." It means the project currently has more real activity behind its price than the narrative suggests. Low score, inverse.
In November, I'll pull up every weekly card and check it against what actually happened in the market. If fundamentals didn't beat narrative, I'll say so.
Tell me where you'd push back, I'd rather find the holes in this now than in November.