#baby $BABY
While checking how Babylon values BTC collateral, I paused at one number: $100 of BTC does not become $100 of borrowing power. The protocol recognises only about $78, then still aims to restore the position to 1.24 after liquidation.

That means BABY is not relying on one safety margin. It is stacking two.

The 78% collateral factor limits how much debt can be created before trouble starts. The 1.24 recovery target handles what happens after trouble has started. One controls entry risk, the other tries to stop the account falling straight back into danger.

Most people see collateral value vs borrowing value. I see pre-liquidation caution vs post-liquidation discipline.

This matters for Babylon because a conservative haircut can look strong on paper, but fast BTC moves, fees, oracle timing, and execution delays can still weaken it. BABY clearly does not treat 78% as enough by itself.

Still, one question bothers me. Does restoring health to 1.24 create real resilience, or liquidate more collateral than necessary just to rebuild a clean buffer?

I am watching whether Babylon’s two-margin design reduces repeat failures, or simply makes the first liquidation feel safer than it really is.

@BabylonLabs_io #baby $BABY