@BabylonLabs_io Trustless is the benefit I keep testing against different parts of how Trustless Bitcoin Vaults (TBV) actually watches itself and the piece I looked into today comes directly from Babylon's own documentation of its Vigilante Checkpointing Monitor a background process most people probably never think about.
Per that documentation the monitor continuously checks two separate things. First whether Babylon's internal record of the Bitcoin chain actually matches what's really on Bitcoin a consistency check. Second whether valid checkpoint data is being reported in a timely way at all described in the documentation as a liveness check distinct from simply checking correctness.
That second check matters because a system can technically have correct data while still failing you through delay. If something true gets held back long enough it functions almost the same as if it were hidden entirely.
I'll be honest that a monitor like this per how it's documented catches problems after they start not before. It's detection not prevention and detection only works if it's actually running and someone's paying attention when it flags something.
Trustless doesn't mean nothing can go wrong. Per Babylon's own framing it means when something does there's a documented way for it to become visible. Does knowing there's active documented monitoring behind a system change how much independent verification you'd personally still want to do yourself?
#baby $BABY
Per that documentation the monitor continuously checks two separate things. First whether Babylon's internal record of the Bitcoin chain actually matches what's really on Bitcoin a consistency check. Second whether valid checkpoint data is being reported in a timely way at all described in the documentation as a liveness check distinct from simply checking correctness.
That second check matters because a system can technically have correct data while still failing you through delay. If something true gets held back long enough it functions almost the same as if it were hidden entirely.
I'll be honest that a monitor like this per how it's documented catches problems after they start not before. It's detection not prevention and detection only works if it's actually running and someone's paying attention when it flags something.
Trustless doesn't mean nothing can go wrong. Per Babylon's own framing it means when something does there's a documented way for it to become visible. Does knowing there's active documented monitoring behind a system change how much independent verification you'd personally still want to do yourself?
#baby $BABY