#baby $BABY @BabylonLabs_io

was reading through Aave's v3 to v4 migration notes last night, mostly out of boredom, and one line from Babylon's own vault paper stuck with me after I closed the tab: a TBV vault's spending conditions, destination contract included, are fixed the moment it's created, that's literally what makes it trustless, nobody can redirect the BTC later without that pre-agreed path. what that quietly means is if Aave ever migrates contracts again the way it just did from v3 to v4, an existing vault can't follow along, it has to unwind on Bitcoin's own timeline and get recreated pointing at the new destination, every single time the destination protocol upgrades. trustlessness here isn't free, it's traded for rigidity, and nobody's really pricing that in. I couldn't find any public details on whether Babylon or Aave have tooling planned to make that transition smoother. this isn't about how safe a vault looks the day you create it, it's about what happens the day the other side of it has to change.

$DEXE

What's the bigger trade-off here?