Oil settled above $100 per barrel for the first time since May after Houthi rebels targeted Saudi ships in the Red Sea, the US carried out its 13th consecutive night of military action against Iran, and President Trump signaled he is not yet ready to negotiate. Iran claimed it targeted US assets in Bahrain and Jordan in retaliation. Four people were killed in Thursday's strikes on Iran, and an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps facility was partly damaged according to Iranian state media. Iran pushed back on reports that it had rejected a ceasefire offer, blaming the US for the escalating conflict. Trump claimed any damage to ships would be paid for with frozen Iranian funds — a claim Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said sets an "incendiary precedent." Bitcoin's FOMC week — the most consequential Federal Reserve meeting since the June 17 decision that triggered six weeks of ETF outflows — now arrives with oil at triple digits, the SPR at a 43-year low, Section 301 tariffs on 99.4% of US imports in effect, and Capital Economics forecasting 75 basis points of additional Fed rate hikes.
Thirteen Consecutive Nights — The Conflict Has No Ceasefire Horizon
The 13th consecutive night of US military action against Iran removes any remaining ambiguity about the conflict's trajectory. The June 19 MOU that constituted a ceasefire collapsed on July 7 when Trump declared it over following mutual airstrikes. Since then, the US has struck Iran every single night for nearly two weeks — targeting bridges in Hormozgan province, the Chabahar maritime control tower, IRGC facilities, and military infrastructure across southern Iran. Iran has responded by targeting US assets in Bahrain and Jordan, maintaining Houthi operations against Red Sea shipping, and keeping Hormuz transits near their lowest levels since the conflict began.
Trump signaling he is not yet ready to negotiate is the most market-significant single statement of the week — more important than any individual strike or Iranian counterstrike. All prior market rallies triggered by Iran-related diplomacy signals — the June 19 MOU, Monday's Reuters ceasefire proposal report — were predicated on the assumption that both sides retained some interest in a negotiated resolution. A Trump statement that he is not yet ready to negotiate removes that assumption for the immediate term and reprices the probability of near-term Hormuz normalization from low to near-zero.
Oil Above $100 — The Inflation Threshold the FOMC Cannot Ignore
Oil settling above $100 per barrel for the first time since May is the most acute single macro data point Bitcoin has faced in the current recovery. The $100 threshold is not arbitrary — it is the psychological and analytical level at which oil's inflationary impact becomes unavoidable for central bank communication. When the FOMC meets July 28-29 with oil above $100, the committee faces a fundamentally different communication challenge than when oil was at $65-70 during the June ceasefire period that made the June CPI's 3.8% reading constructive.
The mechanism is direct and compounding. Oil above $100 means July CPI — due mid-August — will show energy-driven reacceleration from June's 3.8% reading back toward 4%+ or higher. That reading arrives before the September FOMC meeting at which rate hike probability stands at 63%. The SPR at 311.4 million barrels — its lowest since 1983 — means the government's primary policy tool for capping an oil price spike has less capacity than at any point in four decades. And Section 301 tariffs now covering 99.4% of US imports add a second simultaneous inflationary channel — import cost push — on top of the energy-driven demand-pull inflation from Hormuz.
The triple-digit oil price, depleted SPR, and tariff-driven import cost inflation arriving simultaneously into FOMC week is the most adverse macro configuration for Bitcoin's recovery thesis since the April Liberation Day tariff shock that triggered the current correction.
The Red Sea Expansion — Houthis Target Saudi Ships
Houthi rebels targeting Saudi ships in the Red Sea is the geographic expansion of the conflict's shipping disruption beyond the Strait of Hormuz. Hormuz had been the primary chokepoint — carrying approximately one-fifth of global oil and gas supplies before the conflict began, now reduced to eight confirmed transits per day as of July 16's three-week low. The Red Sea is the second critical global shipping chokepoint, carrying approximately 12% of global trade including significant volumes of oil from Saudi Arabia and other Gulf producers routed around Hormuz.
Simultaneous disruption of both Hormuz and the Red Sea creates a compounding supply disruption that no single alternative routing can fully absorb. Ships that avoid Hormuz by going around southern Iran still face Red Sea Houthi interdiction on the route toward the Suez Canal. The Houthi targeting of Saudi ships specifically raises the risk of Saudi production disruption — if Saudi infrastructure becomes a target, oil supply risk expands beyond transit disruption into production disruption, which would be a substantially more severe price driver than the transit closure currently producing triple-digit oil.
Trump's claim that damage to ships will be paid for with frozen Iranian funds — and Iran's response that this sets an "incendiary precedent" — represents a new financial escalation layer on top of the military strikes, further reducing the probability of a near-term diplomatic resolution.
The Bitcoin Framework Into FOMC — Five Simultaneous Headwinds
Bitcoin heading into the July 28-29 FOMC meeting now faces five simultaneous macro headwinds that were not all present simultaneously at any prior point in the current cycle. Oil above $100 is the newest and most acute. The 13th consecutive night of US-Iran strikes with Trump not ready to negotiate removes the ceasefire optionality that had been supporting risk assets on diplomatic signal days. Section 301 tariffs on 99.4% of US imports add goods price inflation to energy price inflation. Capital Economics' 75 basis point rate hike forecast against the market's 40 basis point pricing represents an unresolved macro divergence that the FOMC meeting will begin to clarify. And the SPR at a 43-year low removes the government's ability to buffer the oil shock through strategic reserve releases.
Against those five headwinds, the structural support that has been building throughout the correction remains intact: exchange supply at a nine-year low, 79% LTH supply at a record, six-day ETF inflow streak totaling $930 million, whale accumulation ongoing for two months, and the 200-week SMA at $62,873 holding every test since June. The question FOMC week will answer is whether structural on-chain support is sufficient to hold Bitcoin above $65,000 — and specifically above the $65,000-$65,500 confirmation range analysts identified — against the most adverse macro configuration of the recovery period.
The Daniela Hathorn framework from Capital.com identified $63,000 as the critical support floor where buyers have repeatedly stepped in. With oil above $100 and Trump signaling no negotiations, the probability of Bitcoin testing that floor before the FOMC decision on July 29 has increased materially from where it stood on Tuesday when the six-day ETF streak was extending and chip stocks were rebounding.