#bedrock $BR A strange thing happens in cities.

Imagine a delivery driver with packages from companies on the same route.

The road, fuel and effort are shared,. Each company wants credit for the delivery.

This makes the work harder to measure.

That tension reminds me of what Bedrock does with its -asset approach.

Traditional models with one asset are simple.

One asset goes into one system does one thing and gets one reward.

You can see how it all works.

Things get complicated when one asset is used in systems at once.

At first it seems idle money is being used in more places.

This creates an accounting problem: which system made the value?

The real challenge is not making rewards. Deciding who gets them.

If many networks benefit from the asset, who should get the most?

The user, the system that coordinated it or the infrastructure that made it happen?

What I find fascinating is how this changes the bottleneck.

It's no longer, about finding money to invest. About giving credit for value.

As assets can be used in ways we need to figure out how to recognize value.

Maybe the big question is whether value creation and recognition are ever really the same thing.$STEEM $BTC @Bedrock