The market still thinks BR is mainly a yield story.
What I'm watching instead is whether Bedrock 2.0 changes how Bitcoin capital behaves after it enters the ecosystem.@Bedrock
Most yield products compete by offering slightly better returns. Capital arrives, farms, compares opportunities, and leaves. It's efficient, but it's also temporary. The liquidity never really belongs to the network.

I've noticed that the more mature crypto systems eventually stop optimizing for deposits and start optimizing for capital persistence. That's a very different objective.#Bedrock
What's interesting about Bedrock 2.0 isn't the headline yield. It's the attempt to make Bitcoin liquidity more productive without forcing users to constantly reposition themselves across opportunities. If that works, the value isn't just in attracting capital. It's in reducing the need for capital to leave.

The market often underestimates how much valuation changes when a network becomes a destination instead of a stopover. Liquidity starts behaving differently. Participation becomes less transactional. Retention quietly becomes more important than acquisition.$BR
That's why I'm paying more attention to how BR fits into the coordination of Bitcoin capital than to the yield itself.
This isn't about earning more from Bitcoin anymore. It's about making Bitcoin liquidity stay productive in one place.

Market Seems