cryptonewss

Heard about Vietnam's latest move? The Ministry of Finance just dropped a draft circular slapping a 0.1% tax on every crypto transaction — even if you're selling at a loss. Yep, you read that right: red candles still cost you. Companies get hit with 20% corporate tax on net profits, but retail traders bear the blunt end.
Sure, 0.1% sounds trivial. But grind a few dozen trades a day and watch it bleed your edge dry. The upside? Vietnam's finally dragging crypto out of the gray zone. After a 2025 pilot forcing all trades into dong, we're now getting licensed exchanges (with $400M+ capital requirements — not for garage startups) and a clear legal backbone. Crypto's officially recognized as property, no VAT applied — they're treating it like a real financial instrument, not digital confetti.
Vietnam's consistently ranked among the top countries for crypto adoption. Now regulators want their cut while locking out fly-by-night operators. Risky? Absolutely. But unregulated markets breed chaos — and rules, however imperfect, create breathing room for real growth.
Question is: are you willing to pay 0.1% per trade for transparency and access to regulated platforms — or stay in the shadows and risk getting frozen out?
#Vietnam #CryptoNewss

Here’s the latest on the upcoming White House crypto meeting scheduled for Tuesday, February 10, 2026, which is expected to focus on stablecoin yields — a central issue in U.S. digital-asset policy negotiations: �
Bitget +2
Bitget
yellow.com
Next week’s White House crypto meeting will focus on stablecoin yields, with bank representatives attending for the first time.
Banks Demand Stablecoin Yield Ban As White House Schedules Tuesday Crypto Meeting | Yellow.com
Yesterday
🏛 What’s happening
White House officials have scheduled a staff-level meeting on Tuesday, February 10 to continue discussions over whether stablecoin issuers can offer yield or interest-like rewards to holders — a key sticking point in wider crypto regulatory talks in the U.S. �
Crypto in America +1
This session follows an earlier White House meeting on February 2 that ended without agreement on stablecoin yield provisions and helped stall progress on broader crypto market-structure legislation. �
Reuters
Tuesday’s meeting will again be at the staff level, but for the first time includes senior representatives from major banks (e.g., Bank of America, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo, Citi, PNC, U.S. Bank) alongside crypto industry groups. �
Crypto in America +1
⚖️ Why stablecoin yield matters
The core dispute centers on yield-bearing stablecoins — products that pay interest or rewards to holders (common in the crypto sector but not traditional banking): �
whale-alert.io
Banks’ stance: They argue that if stablecoin issuers offer significant yields, it could act like “shadow deposits” and pull customer funds away from traditional bank accounts, raising risks to banking stability. �
MEXC
Crypto industry’s view: Firms and trade groups counter that stablecoin yield is a competitive tool to attract users, and outright bans would hinder innovation and growth. �
MEXC
📜 Larger policy context
This negotiations tie into efforts to advance U.S. crypto regulation, such as the CLARITY Act and the GENIUS Act framework on stablecoins and digital assets: �
MEXC +1
The stablecoin yield question has been a major point of contention holding up legislative progress, including bills that have passed committees but stalled due to lack of agreement between industry and banks. �
Barron's
White House crypto policy staff — including advisor Patrick Witt — have urged both sides to work toward a compromise on yield rules by the end of the month. �
Crypto in America
📌 What to watch next
Whether the Tuesday meeting produces a compromise proposal that could unblock stalled legislation. �
Crypto in America
How banks and crypto firms adjust their positions — especially if a regulatory framework is shaped that balances innovation with financial stability concerns. �
TronWeekly
If you’d like, I can outline what the political implications might be for crypto markets or explain the competing policy proposals in more detail.
#WhiteHouse
#CryptoNewss
#Stablecoins
#StablecoinYield
#CryptoRegulation

Пока толпа спорит «покупать или поздно», ончейн уже всё показал.
ФАКТЫ, А НЕ ЭМОЦИИ ⤵️
▪️ Более 70% BTC не двигались > 6 месяцев
Это уровень, который исторически совпадал с фазами накопления, а не распределения.
▪️ Баланс BTC на биржах — на минимумах за несколько лет
Монеты уходят с бирж → давление продавцов снижается → предложение сжимается.
▪️ Крупные кошельки (1 000+ BTC) продолжают накапливать
Пока розница ждёт «ещё -20%», деньги с опытом уже в рынке.
▪️ Хешрейт BTC — на исторически высоких значениях
Майнеры не отключаются.
Сеть сильна как никогда.
Это не поведение «умирающего актива».
▪️ Реализованная капитализация обновляет максимумы
В рынок заходит всё больше капитала по более высоким ценам — база держится.
И теперь главный момент 👇
Когда: — предложение сокращается
— долгосрочные холдеры не продают
— институционалы остаются
— волатильность сжимается
➡️ рынок НЕ падает без причины.
Он копит энергию.
❗️ Большие движения начинаются не на хайпе,
а в скуке, сомнениях и страхе.
Большинство снова опоздает.
Как и всегда.
Не финансовый совет.
Это ончейн-реальность.
Ты сейчас:
🔹 в рынке
🔹 ждёшь подтверждений
🔹 или снова смотришь со стороны?
#CryptoMarketMoves #bullmarket #accumulation #CryptoNewss

In early 2026, the Trump administration initiated a major strategy to use government-linked funds to invest directly in U.S. companies producing critical minerals. These minerals, such as neodymium, dysprosium, and other rare earth elements, are essential for industries including semiconductors, defense systems, electric vehicles, renewable energy, and advanced electronics.
Key Actions
The administration reportedly plans to take a 10% equity stake in USA Rare Earth, valued at $1.6 billion, along with $1.3 billion in government-linked financing to help expand mining and magnet production facilities in Texas and Oklahoma.
Earlier actions included converting federal grants into equity positions in semiconductor and materials companies, ensuring domestic access to key industrial resources.
Purpose and Implications
Strengthening Domestic Supply Chains
The U.S. has historically relied on foreign suppliers, particularly China, for rare earth minerals. This strategy aims to reduce dependency and secure critical inputs for high-tech and defense industries.
National Security and Industrial Competitiveness
By taking equity stakes, the government can influence production, prioritize supply during global disruptions, and support long-term competitiveness in strategic sectors.
Market Reactions and Risks
Shares of companies targeted by government investments have surged following the announcements. However, experts caution that government ownership in private markets could create fiscal and operational risks if not managed carefully.
Broader Context
This approach reflects a shift toward active government participation in strategic industries. While proponents argue it enhances national resilience and reduces supply chain risks, critics warn it may interfere with free market dynamics outside of crises. The policy underscores the balance between national security, economic growth, and market efficiency.
#CryptoNewss #TRUMP